Principle 16:
Every Route Must Conclude
Every OneRoute must include an explicit Conclude step that defines what “done” means.
Without a defined end state, work cannot be governed, measured, reused, or truly completed — closure makes outcomes clear, accountable, and comparable.
Plain-English Summary
A OneRoute that does not explicitly end cannot be analyzed, governed, or improved. Every route must include a Conclude step that defines what ‘done’ means.
​
What this Principle Means
Conclude marks a defined end state. Without it, work can drift, repeat indefinitely, or silently hand off to something else. OneRoute requires closure so outcomes are measurable and comparable.
​
Why Closure Matters
Many failures occur not because work was done incorrectly, but because it never truly finished. Explicit conclusion allows accountability, learning, and reuse.
​
What Conclude Represents
-
A stable end condition
-
A handoff point to another route
-
Completion of responsibility for this sequence
​
​​Concrete Examples
Human process: Ticket is resolved and closed.
Observed reality: Work stops but no one knows who owns the outcome.
Natural phenomena: System reaches equilibrium.
​
Mini Case: The Never-Ending Task
A task keeps resurfacing in meetings. Mapping shows no Conclude—only repeated Actions and Decisions. Defining a conclusion eliminates ambiguity.
How to Apply This Principle
-
Ask what ‘done’ means for this route.
-
Define the condition explicitly.
-
Insert a Conclude step when that condition is met.
-
If work continues, it is a new route.
​
Common Misunderstandings
-
Assuming work ends naturally
-
Confusing pauses with completion
-
Treating handoffs as implicit
​
Quick Diagnostic Questions
-
Where does responsibility end?
-
How do we know this route is finished?
-
What happens immediately after conclusion?
​
If You Only Remember One Thing
If you cannot point to the end, the route is incomplete.
​
Canonical Statement
Every OneRoute includes an explicit conclusion.